Shroud of turin radiocarbon dating wrong

Phillips and Hedges suggested, in the scientific magazine Nature (1989), that neutron radiation could be liable of a wrong radiocarbon dating, while proton radiation could be responsible of the Shroud body image formation.

On the other hand, no plausible physical reason has been proposed so far to explain the radiation source origin, and its effects on the linen fibres.

However, some recent studies, carried out by the first author and his Team at the Laboratory of Fracture Mechanics of the Politecnico di Torino, found that it is possible to generate neutron emissions from very brittle rock specimens in compression through piezonuclear fission reactions.

It bears an image of a naked man who, according to forensic pathologists, has endured a Roman crucifixion.The image, though clearly perceptible to the eye, is revealed in much more clarity when reversed into a black and white negative. David Rolfe with cameramen David Crute (L) and Mark Lewis (R) filming the Shroud in 2009 for the film "Material Evidence" for the BBC.This is the only time the Turin authorities have allowed the Shroud to be filmed removed from its bomb-proof case.The Shroud's history (in modern times) begins in 1355 but it has links with a much prized long-lost artefact of similar description stolen from Constantinople during the 4th Crusade.This had a viable provenance back to the 1st century and the Holy Lands.

If the Shroud is one and the same as this object then this would explain why it was kept underground until sufficient time had elapsed and why no explanation for its origins were forthcoming from the aristocratic (and crusader-linked) French family that first exhibited it.

Please or register to post comments
If spammers comment on your content, only you can see and manage such comments Delete all
Numerous people witnessed and videotaped the sampling of the shroud and the samples were packaged unobserved by the Archbishop of Turin and Dr Tite of the British Museum. The scientists from the carbon-dating laboratories were not. 
22-Sep-2018 04:09
The Shroud of Turin Facts and Fiction about the Shroud of Turin that millions believe is the burial shroud of Jesus Christ. 
22-Sep-2018 04:12
Feb 11, 2014. These neutron emissions could have interacted directly with nitrogen atoms in the linen fibers, inducing chemical reactions that created the distinctive face image on the shroud, the scientists say. The reactions also could have led to "a wrong radiocarbon dating," which would explain the results of the 1989. 
22-Sep-2018 04:17
Oct 5, 2015. Here, we report the main findings from the analysis of genomic DNA extracted from dust particles vacuumed from parts of the body image and the lateral edge used for radiocarbon dating. Several plant taxa native to the Mediterranean area were identified as well as species with a primary center of origin in. 
22-Sep-2018 04:22
Jan 2, 2014. And he also makes the following point 'All of the labs used the same cleaning technique, and if there's some kind of contaminant that was not taken care of, it would give the same answer to all three labs, and all three would be wrong.' Gove, H. E. 1996, "Relic, Icon or Hoax? Carbon Dating the Turin. 
22-Sep-2018 04:26
May 6, 2013. PADUA, Italy — Just in time for the current Easter season, news emerged from Italy that a new approach to dating the Shroud of Turin has located it. Riggi di Numana, a participant in the 1978 Shroud of Turin Research Project STURP, as well as the controversial 1988 carbon-dating tests of the shroud. 
22-Sep-2018 04:28
Jun 8, 2015. The Shroud of Turin simply couldn't be authentic unless multiple independent tests somehow produced erroneous results. But then a pair of amateur detectives/scientists. He proposed testing the scorch marks on the shroud for more accurate carbon dating. The new tests have recently been performed. 
22-Sep-2018 04:33
Neutron radiation caused by 33 A. D. earthquake could have led to “wrong” 1988 radiocarbon dating of Shroud, suggest researchers. An earthquake in Old Jerusalem might be behind the famous image of the Shroud of Turin, says a group of researchers led by Alberto Carpinteri of the Politecnico di Torino in Italy in an article. 
22-Sep-2018 04:37
How wrong could they be! The Museum appointed their then Head of Research, Dr Michael Tite to carry out the task. Dr Tite is now a professor at the Oxford Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art. As reported by Dr Harry Gove in his book "Relic, Icon or Hoax? Carbon Dating the Turin Shroud" 1996 it. 
22-Sep-2018 04:42

Shroud of turin radiocarbon dating wrong introduction

Shroud of turin radiocarbon dating wrong

Recent posts

22-Sep-2018 14:58
22-Sep-2018 23:45
23-Sep-2018 05:06
23-Sep-2018 19:24